Learner Reviews & Feedback for Programming Languages, Part A by University of Washington
About the Course
Top reviews
JB
Oct 10, 2016
Fantastic course providing not only a great introduction to Functional Programming fundamentals, but also leading on to how languages relate to one another. Highly recommended.
AS
Dec 29, 2019
Instructor's strive for perfection really shows. The quality of content is top-notch; both for the video explanations and the pdfs. Definitely going to check out the other two parts as well.
551 - 556 of 556 Reviews for Programming Languages, Part A
By Musa J
•Sep 18, 2024
no support from compiler nor editor & no IDE for debug; very dated approach to functional programming
By Hans H
•Dec 8, 2023
It is far too much work to learn the completely outdated editing tool Emacs. I lost interest.
By Kyle A
•Nov 21, 2023
The content is good, but I can't stand the peer-reviewed assignments.
By Gino H
•Jul 7, 2023
Emacs is the worst possible editor to deal with for someonw who wants to learn in this course.
This turns out to be and Emacs course, as you spend all your energy trying to deal with issues related to emacs instead of learning what you are here for: programming.
Emacs gets in the way of actually doing that learning. And there is no support. The forum is a joke.
The instructor cares more about emacs than actually teaching programming.
How does this course even gets rated highly?
By Чумин М Л
•Jun 6, 2024
Not a modern high-level programming language with difficult syntax