Learner Reviews & Feedback for Generative AI: Introduction and Applications by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
PP
Sep 10, 2024
Course is very informative & good . In terms of getting certified, you can allow us to write assignments so we can find the feedback before subscribing.
CS
May 15, 2024
I definitely appreciated that this didn't cover just text-to-image tools. I feel that even if someone is not new to AI, they might do something during this course that they haven't done before.
826 - 850 of 915 Reviews for Generative AI: Introduction and Applications
By Eric S
•Feb 15, 2025
There was a lot of repetition in the course, and they went through the material quickly. I think less repition and more time and emphasis on the important take aways could be more effective.
By Mike Z
•Apr 23, 2024
The quality of the course is meh... nothing you can't learn from Youtube. The quality of the questions asked at the end of each module is absolutely terrible and extremely poorly designed.
By Chris O
•Jan 9, 2024
The quizzes seemed misaligned with the coursework. I would have preferred more talk on specific programs throughout the course if that is what we are being graded on.
By Rebeca R
•Apr 30, 2025
The narrator to the spoke too fast. I often had to keep going back to watch the videos over again, and I feel like the information was just listed and not explained.
By Jithin
•Nov 5, 2025
The course is a bit outdated, but great for learning the basics and key terms like Data Augmentation, Deep Learning, Diffusion Models, Discriminative AI, and more.
By Gerry P
•Feb 28, 2024
I know it’s beginner level but it’s extremely basic. stars given for having some structure and not dragging out the content which means it’s quick to go through.
By ANTHONY T
•Jul 22, 2025
Extremely basic content, half of the course is focused on memorizing AI brand names which isn't particularly useful information to apply in the real world
By Vladislav G
•Jul 29, 2024
Fast course, just intro to AI models. If you know absolutely nothing, might be useful somehow. Otherwise looks like the hole course was generated by AI.
By Joe L
•Dec 31, 2025
this course is for people who have no background in using Generative AI tools. But expect nothing more if you want to learn anything beyond that
By Harsha H R
•Sep 13, 2024
The topics covered is good. Hands on is also good. However, the narration is way too fast. It was difficult to absorb/assimilate the knowledge.
By Jingjing W
•Nov 11, 2025
I don't think I should be quized for all the various AI tools in this course as there are new tools coming out every month
By Jorge L
•Oct 6, 2025
La base es muy interesante y los ejercicios prácticos también, pero algunas de las explicaciones están desactualizadas.
By Nikhil M W
•Aug 20, 2025
good AI based course...................................................................................
By Carina C
•Sep 29, 2025
Feels quite dated, don't know why I need to learn the names of different AI tools for the exam
By Ralph P
•Aug 9, 2024
Very generalized (not that there's anything wrong with being general - hence "average").
By Ioannis K G
•May 3, 2024
Wish it could explain a little bit more on how the generative AI works on the back stage
By Siddhartha S
•Apr 8, 2024
It is good. I think a little more deep insider would be better for senior developers
By Leo L M
•Feb 11, 2025
many different companies were named and introduced, but not much knowledge gained
By Vincent K
•May 11, 2024
Very superficial information considering it a section of a course for developers.
By Antonio E M B
•Mar 15, 2025
El laboratorio final no cargó sus instrucciones, creo que no fue el mejor curso.
By Christopher H
•Sep 11, 2024
I know it's crazy how fast AI moves but a fair amount of the material is dated.
By Onno Z
•Mar 29, 2024
Information is good, video info is to quick, hands-on work is often not working
By Francesco N
•May 4, 2024
Good introduction for those that have not started their journey in AI.
By Rajat S
•Jan 8, 2025
The narration was not as good and well-paced as the previous course.
By R. B
•Mar 1, 2025
The first part was way better made - this one was more a slideshow.